首页> 外文OA文献 >Tool use and hafting in the Middle Palaeolithic of Northern Africa An on-going use-wear analysis on the Mousterian/Aterian assemblages of Ifri n’Ammar (Morocco)
【2h】

Tool use and hafting in the Middle Palaeolithic of Northern Africa An on-going use-wear analysis on the Mousterian/Aterian assemblages of Ifri n’Ammar (Morocco)

机译:北部非洲中部旧石器时代的工具使用和堆垛对Ifri n’Ammar(摩洛哥)的Mousterian / Aterian组合进行的使用磨损分析

摘要

The so-called “Aterian Culture” has received attention since the early days of prehistoric archaeology in Northern Africa. Several definitions were proposed, which triggered a debate around this cultural concept. In particular the presence of the tanged tools was a crucial element in these debates and the tangs were considered to potentially represent the earliest indications of hafting, or at least of intentional morphological adaptations in view of hafting. In contrast to numerous typological and technological studies of Aterian and Mousterian assemblages, use-wear analyses have been scarce up until today. However, for a better understanding of several aspects of these Middle Palaeolithic “cultures”, functional data needs to be taken into consideration. Given the issue of tanged pieces, the potential of such detailed studies on production, hafting and use is high.In this paper, the first results will be presented of an on-going use-wear analysis on tools from the Aterian/Mousterian assemblages of Ifri n’Ammar. This rock shelter presents an ideal case thanks to its particularly rich and well preserved stratigraphy. Around 200 artefacts have been selected up to now, based on their degree of preservation and without restrictions on the level of the tool types. Artefacts were examined macroscopically and microscopically in a search for evidence of their production, hafting and use and an experimental program was set up. Archaeological interpretations are based on new experiments, as well as on the existing large experimental reference collection available at TraceoLab at the University of Liège.The long-term goal of the study is to use a functional approach to answer questions related to lithic assemblage variability. At Ifri n’Ammar, it is clear that the tangs occur on a variety of tools. Due to the presence of tangs in the Aterian and their absence in the Mousterian, it can be hypothesized that there was a shift in hafting techniques between the two cultures/periods. In order to understand whether this change was triggered by functional, cultural, or environmental factors, more functional data is clearly needed.
机译:自从北非史前考古学问世以来,所谓的“阿特里亚文化”就受到关注。提出了几种定义,引发了关于这一文化概念的辩论。特别是,在这些辩论中,缠结工具的存在是至关重要的因素,并且考虑到柄的存在,柄被认为可能代表柄的最早迹象,或者至少是有意的形态适应。与对Aterian和Mousterian组合进行的大量类型学和技术研究相反,使用服装分析一直到今天都很少。但是,为了更好地理解这些中古石器时代的“文化”的几个方面,需要考虑功能数据。考虑到缠结件的问题,对生产,柄部和使用进行详细研究的潜力很大。本文将通过对Aterian / Mousterian组合的工具进行的持续使用磨损分析,得出第一个结果。 Ifri n'Ammar。由于其岩层特别丰富且保存完好,因此该岩石掩体是理想的案例。到目前为止,根据其保存程度并且没有对工具类型水平的限制,已经选择了约200件文物。对人工制品进行了宏观和微观检查,以寻找其生产,悬挂和使用的证据,并建立了一个实验程序。考古学的解释是基于新的实验以及列日大学TraceoLab现有的大量实验参考文献进行的。这项研究的长期目标是使用一种功能性方法来回答与石器组合变异性有关的问题。在Ifri n’Ammar,很明显,各种工具上都有柄脚。由于在Aterian中存在柄脚而在Mousterian中不存在柄脚,因此可以假设两种文化/时期之间的柄部技术都发生了变化。为了了解此更改是否是由功能,文化或环境因素触发的,显然需要更多的功能数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号